home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=94TT0913>
- <title>
- Jul. 11, 1994: Britain:Restyling the Heir
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
- Jul. 11, 1994 From Russia, With Venom
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- BRITAIN, Page 46
- Restyling the Heir
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p> Prince Charles tries to burnish his image with a TV documentary--but his candor startles the nation
- </p>
- <p>By Barry Hillenbrand/London
- </p>
- <p> The moment everyone had been waiting for came about halfway
- through the show. Television journalist Jonathan Dimbleby was
- asking Prince Charles about his relationship with Camilla Parker
- Bowles, the woman long rumored to be his mistress. The prince's
- face assumed the pained intensity of someone suffering from
- an acute intestinal disorder. Speaking in his characteristically
- elliptical sentences, Charles stammered that Parker Bowles was
- an old friend who was "helpful and understanding" during his
- marriage crisis.
- </p>
- <p> Dimbleby persisted: "Were you faithful and honorable to your
- wife when you took on the vow of marriage?" "Yes," Charles answered,
- then paused before adding, "until it became irretrievably broken
- down." There it was: the confession. Charles, the Prince of
- Wales, the heir to the British throne, was by his own admission
- an adulterer.
- </p>
- <p> The prince's confession came during a 2 1/2-hour documentary
- on his life broadcast on Britain's ITV network last week and
- watched by nearly 13 million people, a stunning two-thirds of
- the country's viewing audience. Though Charles' comments on
- his marriage occupied less than 10 minutes of the program, they,
- along with some controversial political statements, sparked
- a renewed debate over his suitability to be King. The House
- of Windsor once again was forced to raise the drawbridge and
- fill the moat against a barrage of criticism.
- </p>
- <p> It wasn't supposed to work that way. The prince's advisers had
- given Dimbleby unusual access to Charles for more than a year
- because they believed that the public would be impressed by
- seeing the prince's tireless toil in support of worthwhile projects.
- "People don't know what a caring, sensitive man he is," says
- an aide. The film shows that attractive side of the prince in
- great detail.
- </p>
- <p> Dimbleby captured Charles talking to residents of a decrepit
- public-housing project in Birmingham and mixing with unemployed
- young people attending a training program in Norfolk funded
- by one of his charitable trusts. He was also shown as an intrepid
- foreign traveler. On camera he projected an awkward charm, both
- endearing and genuine. In a Bedouin tent on the edge of the
- Arabian desert, he sipped camel's milk from a plastic cup. In
- Mexico he picked at a gooey plate of lamb. "I always dread having
- something like that," he said, "in case it is laced with chilies,
- which then rather ruins the rest of your day."
- </p>
- <p> Charles also displayed his wide range of intellectual interests,
- rattling on about everything from holistic medicine and organic
- farming to the merits of national service and the demerits of
- modern architecture. In a conversation with Dimbleby, Charles
- opposed cuts in military spending and criticized ministers for
- not supporting his pet projects. But his most controversial
- statements involved the Church of England. Noting that all great
- religions contain common elements of truth and that his subjects
- follow a variety of faiths, he suggested that when he becomes
- King he should be called "Defender of Faith," rather than "Defender
- of the Faith." Since this would mark a historic break between
- the monarchy and the Church of England, the statement set off
- alarm bells for many Anglicans.
- </p>
- <p> Reaction to the documentary was heated. The press, long criticized
- by the prince for its assaults on his privacy, took the occasion
- to gloat. The tabloids reveled in his admission of adultery;
- the more serious papers zeroed in on his political indiscretions.
- Supporters of Princess Diana, including a dedicated coterie
- of royal writers, rallied to her defense. Says Anthony Holden,
- author of Tarnished Crown: "We were not only looking for a little
- bit of generosity about his wife, but we were also looking for
- a hint of regret or apology from him for shattering people's
- dreams about that fairy-tale marriage. We got neither." Diana
- upstaged Charles on the night of the broadcast by attending
- a charity dinner hosted by Vanity Fair's editor in chief Graydon
- Carter, wearing a smashing ink-blue silk crepe off-the-shoulder
- cocktail dress by Valentino. It was her picture, not Charles',
- that was featured on the front pages the next day.
- </p>
- <p> Even those who thought that Charles came off well in the film
- were dismayed by his marital confession. "It is often better
- not to touch on those things," says Sarah Bradford, author of
- a biography of George VI. "They can come back to haunt you."
- </p>
- <p> Still, a sampling of telephone call-in polls and radio talk
- shows indicated that the program may have improved Charles'
- image--at least in the short run. Richard Tomlinson, author
- of Divine Right, a perceptive new book about British royalty,
- contends that despite the marital comments, the public may have
- been charmed by seeing the prince hard at work for the nation.
- "But in the long term," adds Tomlinson, "Charles is heading
- for trouble, because the film shows that there is something
- in him that finds controversy irresistible."
- </p>
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-